Fortura•Industries
Government & Public Sector
When government systems fail, it’s not a bad customer experience. It’s citizens who can’t get paid, can’t get help, and can’t trust what they’re told.
Fortura•Industries
When government systems fail, it’s not a bad customer experience. It’s citizens who can’t get paid, can’t get help, and can’t trust what they’re told.
Across the world, public sector agencies are under pressure to do more with less. Digital services, AI, open data, whole-of-government platforms, cloud migration and a threat environment that looks more like a battlefield than an IT issue.
USD 4.44M
Global average breach cost (2025)
USD 2.86M
Public sector average breach cost
1,113
Notifiable data breaches in 2024 (Australia)
84,700+
Cybercrime reports (ACSC 2024–25)
In 2025, IBM’s global Cost of a Data Breach report put the average cost of a breach at USD 4.44 million, with the public sector average at around USD 2.86 million—up 12% year-on-year. (Baker Donelson) The Australian Government sector was the second highest for privacy complaints and third highest for notifiable data breaches in 2023–24; the Privacy Commissioner reported 1,113 data breaches across business and government in 2024, up from 893 in 2023. (Australian National Audit Office)
The ACSC responded to more than 1,200 cyber security incidents and over 84,700 cybercrime reports in 2024–25, with an average of one report every six minutes. (Defence Ministers) ASD notified government entities 223 times in 2025 about potential malicious cyber activity—while many agencies still failed to report incidents back. (Cyber.gov.au)
Fortura exists so this doesn’t end with “We didn’t see it coming” on the front page.
“If you’re accountable to citizens, Parliament, Cabinet or Ministers—and you depend on digital systems and data—this page is written for you.”
Tax, benefits, licensing, grants, case management, justice, health, transport—citizens expect frictionless, mobile-first experiences.
Agencies sit on decades of identity, payments, health, education and justice data that is extremely attractive to criminals and foreign intelligence services.
From document triage and policy analysis to call centre bots and case-working assistants, AI is being adopted faster than governance can catch up.
The Cyber Security Act 2024 introduced new obligations under the 2023–2030 Australian Cyber Security Strategy, tightening requirements around critical infrastructure, incident reporting and government cyber maturity. (Department of Home Affairs Website)
All of this is happening while budgets are tight, legacy systems persist, skill shortages bite, and agencies are told to “move fast” on digital transformation.
“For government, the mandate is simple but brutal: be open, be digital, be efficient—and be secure”
Behind the scenes, attackers—criminal and state-sponsored—are running continuous campaigns:
Open data, social media, public org charts and tender documents give adversaries rich context on who does what, who has access, and where the weak spots are.
Phishing, password spraying, credential stuffing and MFA fatigue attacks target public servants and contractors alike. Increasingly, adversaries use AI to customise lures to roles, projects and current events.
ASD’s 2024–25 reporting shows ransomware remains one of the most disruptive forms of cybercrime, with 138 ransomware incidents responded to across sectors—many involving government or critical infrastructure. (CyberPulse)
We’ve already seen the first public disclosure of AI-orchestrated espionage campaigns, where AI agents weren’t just used to write phishing emails, but to autonomously carry out parts of the intrusion. (Anthropic)
The public sector doesn’t just face yesterday’s attacks with today’s tools. It faces tomorrow’s attacks, right now.
Research in 2025 showed that ungoverned AI systems are more likely to be involved in breaches and more costly when they are, with 97% of AI-related breaches lacking basic access controls. (IBM)
“If your AI program sits outside your security program, you don’t have an AI strategy. You have an AI risk.”
For the public sector, this isn’t just about compliance; it’s about maintaining legitimacy when citizens are already wary of how their data is used.
Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) – whole-of-government protective security, including information and cyber security.
Australian Government ISM and ACSC Essential Eight – technical baselines and maturity benchmarks.
Cyber Security Act 2024 – powers and obligations around critical infrastructure, incident reporting and government cyber maturity. (Department of Home Affairs)
Privacy Act, Notifiable Data Breaches scheme and sector-specific legislation (e.g. health, education, justice).
Government Protective Security Requirements (PSR) and NZISM
Privacy Act 2020 and sector-specific obligations
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (NIST CSF)
ISO/IEC 27001 and related controls standards
CIS Controls and other benchmarks
Fortura’s perspective as a challenger is that frameworks are necessary but not sufficient: they give you language and structure; they don’t, by themselves, tell you what to do first in your agency, with your systems and your constraints.
Heaviest costs are non-financial:
Payments delayed, licences and permits stalled, court or tribunal systems offline, emergency service dispatch impacted.
Vulnerable people unable to access support, delays in benefits or case decisions, loss of trust in “digital government”.
Media scrutiny, parliamentary inquiries, independent investigations and long-tail commentary.
From privacy regulators, auditors-general and central agencies.
Add to that the supplier angle: as AI makes deepfake-enabled vendor interactions and synthetic onboarding easier and cheaper, supplier impersonation has become a recurring risk for government procurement and grant processes. (Cyber Daily)
For senior public servants, the real question isn’t “What will cyber cost us?” but:
“What will it cost us—in money, legitimacy and service outcomes—if we don’t get ahead of this?”
Central agencies, auditors-general and privacy regulators will expect clear answers on how AI models are governed, trained, tested and monitored. Shadow AI will become a board- and Parliament-level concern.
The test won’t just be whether you had a breach—it’ll be whether critical services kept running and how quickly you recovered. Cyber will sit inside a broader resilience agenda, not off to the side.
More shared platforms, cross-jurisdictional initiatives and reliance on commercial partners will force whole-of-ecosystem risk management, including supply chain and data-sharing risks.
The test won’t just be whether you had a breach—it’ll be whether critical services kept running and how quickly you recovered. Cyber will sit inside a broader resilience agenda, not off to the side.
Central agencies, auditors-general and privacy regulators will expect clear answers on how AI models are governed, trained, tested and monitored. Shadow AI will become a board- and Parliament-level concern.
More shared platforms, cross-jurisdictional initiatives and reliance on commercial partners will force whole-of-ecosystem risk management, including supply chain and data-sharing risks.
Fortura’s commitment as a challenger is straightforward:
We’re not here to tell you to stop taking risk. We’re here to help you take the right risks—deliberately, transparently, and with your eyes open.
No Sales Scripts. We'll Talk Through Your Situation.
If you're shaping strategy, assessing risk, or preparing for what's next, we'll help you get clear on priorities and act with confidence. Tell us what you're working through - we'll respond quickly.

Get the latest news, research notes, practical guidance, and threat updates written for people making security decisions.

© 2026 Fortura. Operated by Fortura Labs Pty Ltd.
All rights reserved.